2
|
Part of the Politics series
|
A constitutional monarchy or limited monarchy is a form of government established under a constitutional system which acknowledges an elected or hereditary monarch as head of state, as opposed to an absolute monarchy, where the monarch is not bound by a constitution and is the sole source of political power. (The United Kingdom is a constitutional monarchy even though it does not have an actual written constitution.) The process of government and law within a constitutional monarchy is usually very different from that in an absolute monarchy.
Most constitutional monarchies take on a parliamentary form, like the United Kingdom, Canada or Japan, where the monarch may be regarded as the head of state but the prime minister, whose power derives directly or indirectly from elections, is head of government.
Although current constitutional monarchies are mostly representative democracies (called constitutional democratic monarchies[citation needed]), this has not always historically been the case. There have been monarchies which have coexisted with constitutions which were fascist (or quasi-fascist), as was the case in Italy, Japan and Spain, or with military dictatorships, as was recently the case in Thailand.
Contents |
An independent development of constitutional monarchy occurred on the continent of Europe in the years following the French revolution. Napoleon Bonaparte is considered the first monarch to proclaim himself the embodiment of a nation, rather than a divinely appointed ruler, and this view of monarchy became the basis of continental constitutional monarchies. G.W.F. Hegel, in his Philosophy of Right (1820) gave it a philosophical justification that accorded well with evolving political theory and with Protestant Christian views of natural law. Hegel\'s forecast of a constitutional monarch with very limited powers, whose function is to embody the national character and to provide constitutional continuity in times of emergency, has been borne out by the development of constitutional monarchies in Europe and Japan. The largely ceremonial office of president, in some modern parliamentary democracies in Europe, Israel and other nations, can be viewed as a form of elected or appointed version of Hegel\'s constitutional monarch, and his forecast of the form of government suitable to the modern world may be seen as prophetic. The Russian and French Presidents, with their stronger powers, may also be seen as justified in Hegelian terms as wielding the powers suitable to the embodiment of the national will.
As originally conceived, a constitutional monarch was quite a powerful figure, head of the executive branch even though his or her power was limited by the constitution and the elected parliament. Some of the framers of the US Constitution may have conceived of the president as a being an elected constitutional monarch, as the term was understood in their time, following Montesquieu\'s somewhat dated account of the separation of powers in the United Kingdom Montesquieu, 1984; although the term "president" at that time implied someone with the powers of the chairman of a committee of equals, like the rotating "president" of the congress under the Articles of Confederation.
An evolution in political thinking would, however, eventually spawn such phenomena as universal suffrage and political parties. By the mid 20th century, the political culture in Europe had shifted to the point where most constitutional monarchs had been reduced to the status of figureheads, with no effective power at all. Instead, it was the democratically elected parliaments, and their leader, the prime minister who had become those who exercised power. In many cases even the monarchs themselves, while still at the very top of the political and social hierarchy, were given the status of "servants of the people" to reflect the new, egalitarian view.
In present terms, the difference between a parliamentary democracy that is a constitutional monarchy, and one that is a republic, is considered more a difference of detail than of substance, particularly in the common case in which the head of state serves the traditional role of embodying and representing the nation. This is reflected, for example, in all but the most die-hard Spanish Republicans accepting their country\'s returning to constitutional monarchy after the death of Francisco Franco.
Constitutional monarchies with representative parliamentary systems are shown in red. Other constitutional monarchies (shown in violet) have monarchs who continue to exercise political influence, albeit within certain legal restrictions. Constitutional monarchies in beige (currently only one nation, Thailand) are constitutional monarchies in which the constitution has been suspended.
Today constitutional monarchies are mostly associated with Western European countries such as the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, Denmark, Spain, Luxembourg, Monaco, Liechtenstein and Sweden. In such cases it is the prime minister who holds the day-to-day powers of governance, while the King or Queen retains only minor to no powers. Different nations grant different powers to their monarchs. In the Netherlands, Denmark and in Belgium, for example, the Monarch formally appoints a representative to preside over the creation of a coalition government following a parliamentary election, while in Norway the King chairs special meetings of the cabinet.The most significant family of constitutional monarchies in the world today are the sixteen realms, all independent parliamentary democracies in a personal union relationship under Elizabeth II. Unlike some of their continental European counterparts, the Monarch and her Governors-General in the Commonwealth Realms hold significant "reserve" or "prerogative" powers, to be wielded in times of extreme emergency or constitutional crises usually to uphold parliamentary government.
In both the United Kingdom and elsewhere, a common debate centers around when it is appropriate for a monarch to use his or her political powers. When a monarch does act, political controversy can often ensue, partially because the neutrality of the crown is seen to be compromised in favor of a partisan goal. While political scientists may champion the idea of an "interventionist monarch" as a check against possible illegal action by politicians, the monarchs themselves are often driven by a more pragmatic sense of self-preservation, in which avoiding political controversy can be seen as an important way to retain public legitimacy and popularity.
There also exists today several federal constitutional monarchies. In these countries, each subdivision has a distinct government and head of government, but all subdivisions share a monarch who is head of state of the federation as a united whole.
| State | Last constitution established | Type of monarchy | Monarch selected by |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | Co-Principality | Selection of Bishop of La Seu d\'Urgell and election of French President | |
| 1981 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1977 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1973 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 2002 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1966 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1831 | Kingdom; popular monarchyBelgium is the only existing popular monarchy—a system in which the monarch\'s title is linked to the people rather than a state. The title of Belgian kings is not King of Belgium, but instead King of the Belgians. Another unique feature of the Belgian system is that the new monarch does not automatically assume the throne at the death or abdication of his predecessor; he only becomes monarch upon taking a constitutional oath. | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1981 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1993 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1982 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1953 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1974 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1962 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1946 | Empire | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1952 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1962 | Emirate | Hereditary succession directed approval of al-Sabah family and majority of National Assembly | |
| 1993 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed approval of College of Chiefs | |
| 1862 | Principality | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1868 | Grand duchy | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1957 | Elective monarchy | Selected from nine hereditary Sultans of the Malay states | |
| 1911 | Principality | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1962 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 2007 (temp) | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1815 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1987 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1814 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1975 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1983 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1979 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1979 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1978 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1978 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1974 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 2007 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1970 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1978 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution | |
| 1971 | Elective monarchy | Chosen by Federal Supreme Council from rulers of Abu Dhabi | |
| 1688 | Kingdom | Hereditary succession directed by constitution |
|
|
This includes a list of references or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks in-text citations. You can improve this article by introducing more precise citations. |
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia